Recueil

The miscellany — qovets in Hebrew, miscellany in Anglo-Saxon codicological terminology — answers a need particular to the diasporic condition. Unable to build large and stable libraries, the Jewish communities of Europe and the Mediterranean basin favoured versatile codices, gathering into a single volume the texts essential to religious and intellectual life. The cataloguing work carried out by the CNRS's Institut de recherche et d'histoire des textes on medieval Hebrew and Judeo-Arabic manuscripts reveals the scale of this composite production, which blends Bible, liturgy, law, science and poetry [IRHT-CNRS, Manuscrits hébreux et arabes].

Hebrew codicology distinguishes several degrees of assembly: the homogeneous manuscript conceived from the outset as a miscellany by a single copyist, and the composite manuscript resulting from the later binding of independent quires. The study of quires, the fundamental units of the codex, is precisely what allows scholars to reconstruct the genesis of these volumes and to distinguish the successive layers of their formation [Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3, Le livre médiéval : les cahiers]. The miscellany is therefore not a literary genre but a material strategy: it concentrates, within the space of a single object, what other cultures would have dispersed across several works.

This form reached its apogee in the Ashkenazi and Sephardi Europe of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, an era when Hebrew illumination attained its peak. Medieval Jewish illuminated manuscripts, studied notably in the Encyclopædia Universalis, bear witness to the encounter between Christian workshops, which sometimes supplied the decoration, and Jewish copyists, who mastered the sacred text [Encyclopædia Universalis, « Judaïsme — L'art juif : le Moyen Âge, les manuscrits à peinture »]. The miscellany then becomes an object of prestige as much as a tool of piety.

No object embodies the genius of the Hebrew miscellany better than the manuscript held at the British Library under the shelfmark Add. MS 11639, known as the North French Hebrew Miscellany. Produced in northern France in the thirteenth century, this illuminated codex constitutes, according to the facsimile edition directed by Jeremy Schonfield and Ilana Tahan, one of the richest witnesses to the Jewish culture of medieval France before the expulsions [J. Schonfield, I. Tahan, The North French Hebrew Miscellany: British Library Add. MS 11639].

The very designation "miscellany" — a collection — underscores its composite nature: the volume gathers biblical, liturgical, juridical, calendrical, and poetic texts, accompanied by a cycle of illuminations depicting biblical scenes. This concentration of uses makes it at once a prayer book, a manual of computation, a compendium of the Law, and an object of art. The manuscript illustrates the encyclopedic function of the miscellany: to offer its owner, in a single body, the essence of the religious knowledge needed for daily and festive Jewish life.

The historical interest of such a collection extends beyond its content: it documents the existence of a cultivated and prosperous Jewish community in northern France in the thirteenth century, on the eve of the expulsion of 1306. The survival of the manuscript, its subsequent migration, and its entry into British collections recount, by implication, the history of the forced displacements of European Judaism. The object has thus become, for historians, a first-hand source on the liturgy, iconography, and material life of the Jews of France before their dispersion.

Among the collections, the mahzor — literally "cycle" — holds a central place: it gathers the prayers proper to the festivals of the Jewish calendar, in an order fixed by local custom, or minhag. Each major geographic region developed its own rite, and illuminated mahzorim have become pinnacles of Jewish book art. The Mahzor Luzzatto, a manuscript studied notably in the French-language historical press, attests to the richness of this tradition and to the heritage adventures surrounding these precious objects [Mahzor Luzzatto, Wikipedia entry; Magazine Histoire, "SOS Mahzor Luzzatto," 2021].

The town of Troyes, birthplace of Rachi, and medieval Champagne were major centers of this production. The Institut Rachi de Troyes emphasizes the importance of mahzorim and illuminated liturgical manuscripts as witnesses to the religious and artistic vitality of Champenois Judaism [Institut Rachi de Troyes, "Manuscrits hébreux, mazhorim, liturgie juive"]. The liturgical collection is not merely an assemblage of prayers: it fixes and transmits a ritual order, a communal identity, and an aesthetic of its own.

The mahzor illustrates the dual nature of the collection: it is at once a conservatory of ancient texts — piyyutim, prayers, biblical readings — and a living creation, since each community enriches, adorns, and adapts it. The compilation thus becomes an act of transmission as much as of fixation, where liturgical memory crystallizes in the matter of the parchment.

There exists another form of collection, not conceived but accumulated: the genizah, a repository where Jewish tradition preserves disused writings bearing the name of God, which it is forbidden to destroy. The most famous, the genizah of the Ben Ezra synagogue in Fustat, in Old Cairo, yielded one of the vastest documentary collections in the history of Judaism. According to reference notices, it gathered hundreds of thousands of fragments accumulated over nearly a millennium [Cairo Genizah, Wikipedia entry].

This gigantic involuntary collection was revealed to Western scholarship at the end of the 19th century and exploited notably in the first scholarly publications of the early 20th century, as attested by the reviews in the Revue des études juives on the fragments dispersed among American and European collections [R. Gottheil and W. H. Worrell, Fragments from the Cairo Genizah in the Freer Collection, 1927, reviewed in the Revue des études juives, 1928]. The fragments illuminate the daily life, commerce, law, and liturgy of the Mediterranean Jewish communities.

The decisive contribution of recent research has been to show that the genizah contained not only religious texts, but also archives in the documentary sense: registers of rabbinical courts, deeds, commercial correspondence. These works have made it possible to reconstruct medieval archiving practices hitherto unsuspected [Afriques, "Les archives médiévales dans la guéniza du Caire"]. Here, the traditional collection — a pious repository dictated by the Law — meets the modern archive: religious custom unwittingly constituted the greatest documentary collection of medieval Judaism. Tradition and archive merge and mutually confirm one another.

With the advent of printing and then modern scholarship, the anthology changed its face without changing its function: it remained an instrument for concentrating and transmitting Jewish knowledge. The scholarly anthology extends the medieval ideal of the composite codex, this time bringing together texts, commentaries, and analyses for the benefit of a wider audience. The Anthologie du judaïsme, a collective work uniting several specialists, illustrates this ambition to cover, in a single volume, millennia of Jewish culture — religious foundations, symbols, philosophical thought, literature, and history [Anthologie du judaïsme, dir. F. Cicurel, D. Azuélos, G. Bensoussan, G. Bensussan].

This undertaking is part of a long tradition of cultural transmission, supported by institutions devoted to safeguarding Jewish memory, as the initiatives of the Fondation pour la Mémoire de la Shoah surrounding the anthology of Judaism attest [Fondation pour la Mémoire de la Shoah, « Anthologie du judaïsme »]. The modern anthology thus takes on a mission of relay: after the ruptures of the twentieth century, it reconstitutes a threatened heritage and makes it accessible once more.

At the same time, the work of catalogues and critical editions — that of the IRHT, of scholarly publishers such as Brepols for Hebrew and Arabic manuscripts — constitutes another form of scholarly compilation: no longer an anthology of texts, but a systematic inventory of the collections themselves [Brepols, Manuscrits hébreux et arabes]. The anthology then becomes an object of study as much as an instrument of transmission, in a reflexive movement where scholarship compiles the compilations of the past.

From the illuminated codex of Northern France to the millennial repository of Fustat, from the Champenois mahzor to the contemporary anthology, the "Compendium" appears as one of the matrix forms of Jewish culture. It responds to a historical condition — dispersion, exile, the threat hanging over books and communities — with a formal answer: to concentrate, to gather, to transmit. Whether conceived by a single copyist, accumulated through piety, or edited by scholarship, the compendium always obeys the same imperative of total memory.

Its dual nature — object of devotion and object of knowledge, family treasure and documentary source — explains its historiographical fecundity. Hebrew compendia are today among the most precious sources for reconstituting the life of Jews in the Middle Ages, and their codicological study continues to reveal unsuspected layers of their formation. In this, the compendium is not merely a book: it is a Jewish way of inhabiting time, of rescuing from oblivion that which carries meaning, and of making compilation an act of fidelity. The present Great Book, itself a compendium of compendia, modestly takes its place in this lineage.